Answer:
D. $65,000
Explanation:
Data provided
Direct labor = $56,500
Manufacturing overhead = $8,500
The computation of Conversion costs is shown below:-
Conversion costs = Direct labor + Manufacturing overhead
= $56,500 + $8,500
= $65,000
Therefore for computing the conversion cost we simply add the direct labor with manufacturing overhead.
Answer:
The answer is A. cash and short-term investments by daily cash operating expenses
Explanation:
This is calculated as follows:
cash and short-term investments(cash equivalents) ÷ daily cash operating expenses.
Cash equivalents are very short-term securities. They are very liquid and can be converted to cash very quickly. Examples are bank accounts short-term securities like treasury bills.
Days cash on hand is the number of days that a firm can afford to pay its operating expenses, given the amount of cash available.
Strategic alliances are generally meant to increase the business strength. Most of the cooperative strategies aim at drawing upon the individual strengths of partners to be more competitive as a single unified unit.
There are a lot of challenges in getting cooperative strategies to work as envisaged during the planning phases. When corporate companies seek cooperation strategies, the hindsight which comes is that most of them compete against each other).
Hence, it is natural that such companies will seek to fulfill their interests first before considering the interests of their partnerships. Then, some companies seek cooperative partnerships with partners who are already having other collaborators.
It also follows that such cooperation lacks commitment. There is also a lack of detailing the operational structure by which operational strategy will be a great success.
To know more about Strategic alliance here:
brainly.com/question/14014533
#SPJ4
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
Common Resource
public good
private good
Explanation:
A club good is a type of public good. It is excludable but non-rivalrous. For example paid streaming services are an example of a club good. Those who do not subscribe are excluded from using the service. But all subscribers have equal assess to the service
A public good is a good that is non excludable and non rivalrous. Everyone has assess to the statue and because one person is enjoying the view of the clock does not means another person cannot enjoy the view of the clock
A private good is a good that is excludable and rivalrous. They are usually exchanged in the market by private sector businesses. It is only you who purchased the drum set and those you allow that can use the drum set.
A common resource is a good that is non excludable but rivalrous. The bike in the fitness room is an example. Because the gym is open to anyone, it is non excludable. Only one person can use it at a time, thus it is rivalrous
