1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
insens350 [35]
3 years ago
11

What did the Indus Valley civilizations use their granaries for?

History
1 answer:
Vedmedyk [2.9K]3 years ago
7 0
The Indus Valley civilians used granaries for c. storing food
You might be interested in
What was the purpose of the japanese attack on pearl harbor hawaii
nalin [4]
They intended to damage the u.s. fleet so badly that by the time it could be rebuit they would have uncontested control of all of asia and the south pacific
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was an outcome of the Yalta conference?
hoa [83]

Answer:

The answer is Option C: The countries agreed to divide Germany into four zones of occupation.

Explanation:

The Yalta Conference was held on February 4 to 11, 1945. It was a meeting between the leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union to discuss what would occur with Germany in the postwar reorganization and the rest of Europe. The allies also agreed that Germany would undergo demilitarization and that the nazis would be prevented from remaining active or organized. Stalin insisted on maintaining control of Poland but that he would allow free elections.

8 0
3 years ago
Help fast!!!
kifflom [539]

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag and drop each example into the correct box
kipiarov [429]

take a picture I dont know what to answer...

8 0
3 years ago
What happens if you kill the president and vide president?
sdas [7]
You get thrown into jail. Duh.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who commanded Confederate troops at the First Battle of Bull Run and the Battle of Shiloh?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    14·2 answers
  • Arrange the events in chronological order.
    5·2 answers
  • How do modern Native Americans exercise sovereignty?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the name of the epidemic that swept throughout the Byzantine Empire, killing over 5,000
    8·1 answer
  • Why does the 15 Amendment matter
    6·2 answers
  • French encroachment into Texas began to worry the Spanish.
    8·1 answer
  • How did the election of 1968 illustrate divisions in American society?
    14·1 answer
  • How did human societies begin to change at the conclusion of the last Ice Age
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the effects of the printing press was the most historically impactful?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!