Answer:
In the country that promotes free-market economy is expected to start seeing firms arriving in this country and invest in those activities where this country has a comparative advantage.
Explanation:
This would lead to an efficient allocation of productive resources taking the economy to optimum production. The technology and tools will rapidly spread, and the industrialization process will be achieved. In the other country, investment and technology implementation is lead by the government allocating resources inefficiently and delaying industrialization.
The answer to this question is "Moral Hazard". Hence I<span>f an individual and companies believe they can pursue rewards without facing the risks that should be attached to those pursuits, they are more likely to engage in irresponsible and even unethical behavior. this situation is known as a MORAL HAZARD. This is a belief of a company that they can pursue rewards without facing a problem or any issue.</span>
The bond payments are more predictable than stocks because bond owners know the size and timing of payments they will receive.
Bonds refers to the promise by a borrower to pay the lender his/her principal and the interest on the loan given.
- Bonds is an instrument used by company as an alternatives to taking a loan from banks.
- Generally, the bond payments are more predictable than stocks because bond owners know the size and timing of payments they will receive.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Bonds
<em>brainly.com/question/25481446</em>
Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
