Question

Explain how the scopes trial illustrated the conflict between modernism and fundamentalism

Answer 1

Answer:The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes and regularly alluded to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legitimate case in July 1925 in which a substitute secondary teacher, John T. Extensions, was blamed for abusing Tennessee's Butler Act.  

The Fundamentalist– Modernist contention is a noteworthy break that started during the 1920s and '30s inside the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America. At issue were fundamental debate about the job of Christianity, the specialist of Scripture, the passing, Resurrection, and making up penance of Jesus.  

The Scopes-Monkey Trial was a broadly advanced conflict among fundamentalists and innovators. Fundamentalists passed laws in schools that rendered the instructing of advancement illicit. A pioneer - John Scopes- - overstepped this profoundly fundamentalist law and instructed development to his understudies. For this he was arraigned. In spite of the fact that the preliminary was a fundamentalist triumph - Scopes was discovered liable - innovators would at present battle for their entitlement to show development and science as opposed to religion-based creation legends. =)

Explanation:

Answer 2

Answer:

The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes and regularly alluded to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legitimate case in July 1925 in which a substitute secondary teacher, John T. Extensions, was blamed for abusing Tennessee's Butler Act.  

The Fundamentalist– Modernist contention is a noteworthy break that started during the 1920s and '30s inside the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America. At issue were fundamental debate about the job of Christianity, the specialist of Scripture, the passing, Resurrection, and making up penance of Jesus.  

The Scopes-Monkey Trial was a broadly advanced conflict among fundamentalists and innovators. Fundamentalists passed laws in schools that rendered the instructing of advancement illicit. A pioneer - John Scopes- - overstepped this profoundly fundamentalist law and instructed development to his understudies. For this he was arraigned. In spite of the fact that the preliminary was a fundamentalist triumph - Scopes was discovered liable - innovators would at present battle for their entitlement to show development and science as opposed to religion-based creation legends.