Britain spent a huge amount of money fighting the Revolutionary War, increasing national debt hugely and creating a yearly interest of nearly ten million pounds. Taxes had to be raised as a result. The trade which Britain relied on for wealth was severely interrupted, with imports and exports experiencing large drops and the recession which followed caused stock and land prices to plummet. Trade was also affected by naval attacks from Britain’s enemies, and thousands of merchant ships were captured.
On the other hand, wartime industry such as the naval suppliers or the elements of the textile industry which made uniforms experienced a boost, and unemployment fell as Britain struggled to find enough men for the army, a situation which would cause them to hire German soldiers. British ‘privateers’ experienced as much success preying on enemy merchant ships as almost any of their opponents.
The effects on trade were also short term, as British trade with the new USA rose to the same levels as trade with them in colonial form by 1785, and by 1792 trade between Britain and Europe had doubled. Additionally, while Britain gained an even larger national debt, they were in a position to live with it and there were no financially motivated rebellions like those of France.
Indeed, Britain was able to support several armies during the Napoleonic wars (and even field its own instead of just paying for other peoples). It's been said that Britain was even right to lose the war because of the economic benefits.
Answer:
C.Printing opinions to take away others' rights.
Explanation: Okay so let me start out! There is an entire Bill of rights (Connected with constitution) Giving citizens in our country several rights (known as ammendments) They are meant to state your rights as a civilian of the US. These shall not be tampered with, and if you want to look even further into the declaration of independance (Paragraph 3) its states you have "Unalienable rights" meaning your rights shall not be tampered with/Taken away.
Thus, the logical answer would be C.
Answer:
No because they believed that they had more power and were more fit for society. Many followed the idea of Social Darwinism or "Survival of the fittest" meaning those cut out for society would live and those not would perish. Those who were rich found them selves higher up in class and deemed themselves superior.
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
Answer:
The president nominates a chair and vice-chair, both of whom the Senate must also confirm. The chair and vice-chair are appointed to four-year terms and can be reappointed, subject to term limitations.
