Answer:
Confucius created his philosophy because he wanted a foundation to establish values. Confucianism is built on ancient ideas about institutions, ideals, and principles. Confucius wanted to bring peace and stability to society. He wanted mutual respect and love towards the public. Confucius' main goal was to teach people how to live with integrity and through his teachings, he tried to resurrect rituals and propriety in Chinese society.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you get started :)
Answer:
She takes long break from work and shirks her responsibility.
Explanation:
D) Based on equity theory, employees who perceive inequity can change his or her inputs at will. Therefore they evert less effort if they are underpaid, or exert more effort if they are overpaid. If Megan takes long breaks from work and shirks her responsibilities, then this would mean that she is trying to gain a sense of equity by reducing her inputs. If Megan had told her boss for a raise by citing her years of experience with such company, then this would mean that she is trying to gain a sense of equity by changing her outcomes. If she then decidesto interrupts her fellows and refuses to let her get any work done, then this would mean that she is trying to reduce her colleague's inputs. The argument is neither strengthened nor weakened by the fact that she accepts extra responsibilities but fails to carry them out properly.
Answer:
It enraged the crowd and the president because the country was at war with Germany and equating him to the Kaiser was an insult due to the atrocious actions that had been committed by him.
Explanation:
During the women's suffrage movement, suffragists considered that US president Woodrow Wilson was deceitful and a fraud. The reason is that he was fighting for democracy abroad while he and his supporters were forbidding the right to vote to women, who were American citizens. Thus, he was acting in opposition to the ideal democracy in his own country.
All of the activities designed to get a candidate elected to public office are called campaigns. .
Grant and Sherman used the strategy of total war to shorten the war in their favor, using the many deaths of enemies to save lives on their side. We may never know if more would've died if they didn't use the tactic, but in my opinion civilian lives were not theirs to take. Soldiers agreed to die, but civilians didn't, making total war, in my opinion, not right. Others may say that their lives were a necessary sacrifice towards a common goal, but, in my opinion, if one side uses total war, can't the other side use it too for a horrible end? Form your own opinion, but that is mine.
