Answer:
and Malcolm X were both civil rights leaders during the 1960s. Both were deeply religious but had different ideologies about how equal rights should be attained. MLK focussed on nonviolent protest (e.g., bus boycotts, sit-ins, and marches), while Malcolm X believed in attaining equal rights by any means necessary.
Explanation:
:)
<em><u> There were few issues related to first draft of Articles of Confederation such as it gave too much power in the central government and too little power for the courts</u></em>.
Further Explanation:
<u>The Articles of Confederation was the agreement within the 13 States of USA which were part of the first constitution.</u> Once all 13 states gave their approval in regards to The Articles of Confederation, it was implemented and it came into force 1781. The farmers of the constitution thought that it was important to have a national judiciary. <u>This article clearly showed that there was distrust among the people of United States of America in regards to a strong central government</u> within the country which takes all the actions and makes all the laws for the welfare of the country and it was the start of ‘American Revolution” <u>another issue which these Articles had was the lack of judiciary became problem as there were issues between states and they always stood against each other in courts as if one verdict came in a case against one state then that state would not accept that verdict.</u> This problem was seen by the people who made the constitution and wanted to make all states to work with each other, Articles of Confederation needed to be changed or scrapped completely which was lastly done. Articles of Confederation lasted for period of 8 years and were replaced by the current constitution of United States in year 1789.
Learn more:
1. Why were civil rights supporters disappointed with the supreme court’s 1896 decision in Plessey v. Ferguson?
brainly.com/question/2390884
2. After world war ii, why did the ussr want to control countries in eastern Europe? brainly.com/question/3195009
Answer details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Articles of Confederation
Keywords: Articles of Confederation, Distrust, State disputes, Court disputes, Constitution, Agreement, United States of America, Scrapped, Adoptions, Judiciary.
Correct answer: C) Implied powers
Explanation:
Sometimes referred to as the "Elastic Clause," the "necessary and proper" clause of the United States Constitution grants Congress implied powers beyond the specifically stated ones in the Constitution.. After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I of the Constitution closes by saying Congress shall have power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." That's a quite broad and "elastic" statement, which goes beyond specifically delegated powers and gives Congress additional implied powers.
An example of the implementation of such implied powers in the Constitution occurred when Alexander Hamilton, as our nation's first Secretary of the Treasury, argued in favor of establishing a national bank. Hamilton believed that anything that is not strictly forbidden in the Constitution is allowable. A national bank was not strictly listed as something Congress could establish, but there was nothing in the Constitution to prohibit it. And the "necessary and proper" clause gave leeway to create it, by the implied powers given to Congress.
Because of the trading posts in Lisbon, it became the only entrance point for Asian goods into Europe. It was either that or deal with the Arab traders through the middle east and that was not economically viable, so they all started trading with Portugal.
Marbury v Madison. The first case in supreme Court that declared an act of Congress as unconsitutional