1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
3 years ago
14

PLEASE ANSWER ASAP !

English
1 answer:
AnnZ [28]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: A, A, C, She forgave them because she's kind-hearted and generous and gracious, The final two paragraphs are about the morals of the story, as the story is meant to show that if you're kind to everyone even if they're bitter to you, things will work out as they should in the end.

Explanation:

I read the story...?

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer. Select the number of punctuation errors. The lady made detailed plans, engaged the caterer1 and the o
VladimirAG [237]

I believe it is A due to "The lady made detailed plans, engaged the caterer and the orchestra well in advance" isn't exactly connect well and be hard to understand so you'd put a comma between "caterer, and".

5 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the only word that is spelling Wrong in the dictionary
mezya [45]
Its "Incorrect"

I am guessing?
But my answer might  "Incorrectly" be wrong


It just depends on your answer choices.



4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is "Araby" about or who is involved in "Araby"?
solmaris [256]

Answer:

"Araby" is about a young boy in Ireland obsessed with the girl living across the street.

When the young girl mentions how badly she wants to attend a certain bazaar, he sees an opportunity to win her heart by attending the bazaar himself and bringing her back a gift.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is called male sex hormones <br>a. Glans<br>b. Sperm cell<br>c. Penis​
Sergio [31]
I think it’s glans you can double check Thai should come up

Have a good day
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The rain fell all day. As a result, the garden was wet.
    8·1 answer
  • Which one of the following statements contains bias?
    6·1 answer
  • A thesaurus is a book thats useful for finding?
    5·2 answers
  • 1. SAT Question of the day:
    15·2 answers
  • Which is an example of personification?
    6·1 answer
  • Help?
    11·1 answer
  • Finally passing his exam was the ____ of Victor's
    8·1 answer
  • What inferences can you make about the background and personality of Samuel
    15·1 answer
  • Why are elections considered lifeline of every democracy?
    7·1 answer
  • Connotation: Rather than calling military action “war”, Henry calls it a “struggle for liberty.” What is the effect of Henry uti
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!