1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shutvik [7]
3 years ago
11

The principle that state governments and the federal government work together to devlop national policies is know as

Law
1 answer:
Tanzania [10]3 years ago
4 0
Cooperative federalism would be your answer.
You might be interested in
QUESTION 7
Zigmanuir [339]

If the president opposes the bill, he can veto it and return the bill to Congress with a veto message suggesting changes unless the Congress is out of session then the president may rely on a pocket veto. ... Congress may override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Mr. Lynn, an agent for Acme Insurance, Inc. thinks that, since state laws are preempted concerning the marketing of Medicare hea
n200080 [17]

What might you, as his colleague, advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is: d. Organizations sponsoring Medicare health plans are responsible for the behavior of their contracted representatives and will be conducting monitoring activities to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal law and guidance and plan policies. Furthermore, state agent licensure laws are not preempted and he must abide by their requirements.

<h3>What is medicare?</h3>

A medicare can be defined as a health insurance coverage that help to cover medical expenses.

Based on the given scenario what  you might  advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is that company that is incharge of the medicare plan are the one incharge of the representatives behavior.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about medicare here:brainly.com/question/1960701

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
3 years ago
What is an incentive?​
lana [24]
Something that motivates somebody
5 0
3 years ago
True/False - A person under 18 years of age may not operate a motor vehicle while using a wireless communications device, except
lutik1710 [3]
I feel as if it’s false
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • !!!!!! 50 POINTS !!!!! Explain why the limits on rights in the following passage are important and
    14·2 answers
  • Why did my parints devorce? ​
    14·2 answers
  • Which action is a domestic policy decision? A. The president signs a piece of legislation eliminating foreign aid to a former al
    7·2 answers
  • 1. Which of the following is an S corporation permitted to do?
    10·1 answer
  • Why so many people say that trump is starting a purge outta no where ?is this statement true or false? EXPLAIN!!
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a new technology that makes correctional<br> institutions safer?
    7·1 answer
  • A safe following distance for a car is?
    13·2 answers
  • A particular issue with refugee families is that
    11·1 answer
  • Which sorts of countries tend to benefit from a federal system?.
    7·1 answer
  • when firms from wealthy countries trade with firms from poor countries, they benefit from economic____.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!