As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be <u>Georgia</u>.
<h3>Why would the venue be Georgia?</h3>
The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.
Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.
Find out more on original venues at brainly.com/question/342388.
Answer:
Mira la respuesta a continuación
Explanation:
En una democracia, cada individuo tiene derechos a la libertad que van desde el habla, el movimiento, la asociación, la vida, etc. Sin embargo, las leyes hechas por las autoridades de un estado son vinculantes para todos los ciudadanos de ese estado. La autonomía no debe confundirse con rebelión e insubordinación. Ningún individuo está por encima de la ley y no hay libertad para la desobediencia de las leyes hechas por la autoridad de un estado.
Además, no hay licencia para que la autoridad infrinja los derechos de las personas. Es por eso que existe el derecho a la libertad de audiencia imparcial. Los ciudadanos pueden demandar a la autoridad si presentan leyes que están en contra de las personas. Las personas, en este caso, pueden ejercer sus derechos.
Por lo tanto, es cierto que en una sociedad que funciona democráticamente, cualquier oposición planteada por el autor puede ser superada porque tanto el individuo como la autoridad tienen derecho a una audiencia imparcial en el tribunal de justicia.
Answer:
explanation
Explanation:
absolutely anyone can.
because tonnes of people are breaking the law right now.
The problem, in this case, was that Raudhah established a contract with Adam before he knew if the loan application would be approved.
<h3>What should be done in this case?</h3>
- Raudhah should have made the contract with Adam after the loan application was approved.
- Raudhah cannot keep Adam's products without paying for them.
- The contract between Raudhah and Adam must be in writing and accurately determine the payment date.
Raudhah bought Adam's products not sure if he could afford them. This became an issue as Raudhah's funding was not approved.
Adam should have reviewed the contract and not agreed to deliver the goods without assurance of payment.
More information about contracts is in the link:
brainly.com/question/14315509
Yes but with some restrictions
