Here so the other guy gets brainiest :)
The crisis set the stage for the battle between Unionism and state's rights, which eventually led to the Civil War. The Nullification Crisis also stalled the agenda of President Jackson's second term and led to the formation of the Whig Party and the Second American Party System.
The correct answer is C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure.
Mexican citizens had conflicting views of Porfirio Diaz’s rule because he limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure
Porfirio Díaz (1830-1915) was the Mexican dictator that ruled the country from 1876 to 1911. He was a controversial figure in Mexican politics. On one side, he was an unyielding dictator and suppressed people's liberties, but on the other hand, he had the vision to modernize México and heavily invested in the construction of railroads to connect the country and to improve transportation and trade.
The other options of the question were A) He had a popular agenda of liberal reform but he did not institute policies that led to a lasting change. B) He led Mexico to military victories but he did not achieve great social and economic stability. C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. D) He made strides in reducing the economic gap but he was a harsh and unyielding dictator.
They did it because the Ottoman Empire were suspicious of who wasn’t/ was Turkish or Muslim (something along those lines)
Answer:
That is true. I had a similar question like that and did my 2WO MINUTE RESEARCH
