1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
13

Based on your reading in the web text, respond to the following prompt in one to two paragraphs. Describe the impact of Dr. Mart

in Luther King Jr.'s assassination on the effort to expand civil rights for African Americans. How might the struggle for civil rights have evolved differently if Dr. King had not been killed? Be sure to answer the following questions:1) What were one or two specific consequences of Dr. King's assassination? 2) Do you think these events would have taken place even if Dr. King had not been assassinated? 3) Why or why not?
History
2 answers:
12345 [234]3 years ago
8 0

The death of Martin Luther King Jr. took place on April 4, 1968. This event was a deep shock to all Americans, particularly those involved in the civil rights movement.

After news of the assassination became widespread, rioting took place all over the country. More than 100 cities experienced riots, including burning and looting. The reaction also led to the speedy passage of civil rights legislation. The Fair Housing Act was passed on April 11, which prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental and financing of property. It is unlikely that the rioting would have happened without the assassination. If it had, it probably would have been less significant. In terms of the Housing Act, it is unclear whether this would have passed anyway or not, but at the very least, it is likely that the assassination made this process faster.

Lera25 [3.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The impact of King's killing basically, is a wake up call to African American from different strata of the society that inequality is real and also led to the revival of the federal fair housing bill which has been stagnant for a while before King's assassination. In addition, it led to the radicalization of many blacks leading to the formation of many black movements.

His assassination spurred both the middle class and the poor among the populace to come together for the first time and fight a cause which Luther King and many poor African Americans have been fighting. Prior to this time, few middle class have been involved in his fight for equal rights for African Americans.

In the event that King wasn't killed, civil right would have always take the peaceful mode modeled by Dr. Luther King before his assassination. So no significance difference would have existed from the way King handles the cause while he was alive and afterwards.

Of the consequences of the assassination of king was,

1. There was a widespread rioting within the nation which led to the destruction of properties in many cities.

2. It also led to White racism- an assumption that the whites are superior to other races and should take a domineering position over them.  

The event wouldn't have taken place because the leader of the civil right cause would have still remained Dr. Luther King who will instill the sense of peaceful protest in his followers no matter what.

You might be interested in
Which group organized a series of protests, including a Prayer Pilgrimage in Washington, D.C., which helped convince Congress to
SCORPION-xisa [38]
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Social Darwinism was a philosophy that stated that _______
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

The answer is only the best people survived in industrialized society.

Explanation:

Social darwinism is the social application of the biological evolution theory of Darwin. It states that that in the society, the ones who thrive are those who adapt the best way to the changes.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did some Texas farmers, merchants, and politicians favor free trade?
pav-90 [236]
I believe the answer is C. <span>Free enterprise allowed businesses to operate with little government interference.
Little government interference usually lead to the smaller amount of taxes that they had to pay for their business operation. On top  of that, it also give businesses more power to control the consumer behavior that would increase the overall market share.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Who believed that everyone was born good...
Alexeev081 [22]
The answer is john locke
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the burglary, what do you think president Nixon should have done? Why?
Zolol [24]
Is the question multiple choice
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Whose presence does Wiesel sense during his speech?
    15·2 answers
  • Actions and attitudes which demonstrate that the Holy Spirit resides within us are called the_____ of the Spirit.
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement about the US Mexican War is true? a. Some Texans saw the war as a chance for revenge b. Texan women played an in
    7·1 answer
  • Which economic system is defined as the use of private resources to make a profit?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes how Pepin the short helped the Pope , in exchange the pope's support ?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of the phrase "general good of the colony?"
    14·1 answer
  • How did Cattle Ranching first start in Texas?
    15·2 answers
  • Explain how nearly anyone could become a miner under Spanish Mining Code.
    14·2 answers
  • Who here has the app Sound cloud?
    6·1 answer
  • What problem would Spain have if Cuba and the Philippines revolted at the same time
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!