A. colonists wanted to settle in the ohio valley and land father west
Answer: ...
Explanation: Tanto Aristóteles como Platón creían que los pensamientos eran superiores a los sentidos. Sin embargo, mientras que Platón creía que los sentidos podían engañar a una persona, Aristóteles afirmó que los sentidos eran necesarios para determinar adecuadamente la realidad. Un ejemplo de esta diferencia es la alegoría de la cueva, creada por Platón.
Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
Answer:
binding arbitration would end unrestricted economies all through a large part of the economy. Government authorities could direct wages and working conditions to any organization sufficiently disastrous to be coordinated.
binding arbitration would do the same amount of harm to laborers' privileges. They would lose all resources as of now accessible to them. Endorsers would lose their entitlement to decide on sanctioning the agreement they should work under, and they couldn't strike over the last agreement, regardless of how awful it is. Restricting intervention gives laborers an agreement if they like it.
binding arbitration could likewise cost laborers their annuities. Associations are probably going to press the mediator to constrain recently coordinated specialists to join a multi-manager association benefits plan, and in enterprises where these plans are normal, the judge would almost certainly concur.
Explanation:
With organization enrollment in consistent decay, Coordinated Work faces a decision. It can accomplish the difficult work important to shed the New Arrangement model that actually shapes its obsolete approach and adjust to the present economy. Or on the other hand it can utilize its political muscle and get Congress to make it simpler to constrain laborers to join.
The Germanic tribes that took over the Roman Empire territory in the west had a history as tribal and hunting/agricultural societies. Even in times when it was fracturing in many ways, the Roman Empire was built around central organization and governance. The Germanic tribes had been more loyal to their own tribal groups than they were confederated into a unity with one another. Their historical patterns of development also had been more built around hunting and farming. They were not as developed in coordinating government over a massive stretch of territory. The Germans had begun learning things from the Romans during the years when many of them served as mercenaries in Roman armies. And they would learn more about building a far-reaching system of government. They were not ignorant "barbarians" when they took over Roman territory, but they weren't united in a plan to govern the region as a unit the way Rome had.
For comparison, you might think of the difference between the Native American nations that existed in North America when settlers from Europe came and took over their territory. In that case, the situation was reversed. The native tribal nations were used to operating independently as their own tribal nations, and were focused largely on hunting and agriculture. The white settlers were aiming at building a society more similar to how Rome had operated.
