The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct
<span>Items listed in a job description detailing work to be performed are </span>Tasks.
Answer:
unsolicited trade
Explanation:
In this scenario, the trade that was made would be considered an unsolicited trade. This is mainly due to the customer having called the representative telling him to place the trade and buy the 100 shares of ABC stock. Therefore, this trade was ultimately the idea of the investor (customer) in this scenario and not the representative's idea. That would make this trade fall into the category of an unsolicited trade. If the idea was initially the representative's and he was the one to mention the trade to the client then it would have been a solicited trade, but this is not the case.
Answer:
(B) U(c,f)=min{2c,f}
Explanation:
This is an example of Leontif utility function which states that the preferences of a consumer is to a constant ratio of quantities of two or more goods in his demand bundles and having an extra unit of a single good will not increase the utility of the consumer and will make the extra unit to waste. But having more units of all the goods in the demand bundle which maintain the constant ratio will increase the utility of the consumer.
A good example usually used in economics is that of a pair of shoe. Having one right and one left of a type of shoe gives a consumer utility at a constant ratio of 1:1, and increasing each leg by multiple of one at every point in time will increase the utility of the consumer, while increasing just only one makes the utility not to change. For instance, having only two left shoe will not give the consumer any utility and make both the left shoe useless.
In the question, the ratio of cups of corn meal, denoted by c, and cups of flour, denoted by f, is 2:1. This implies that to increase the utility of the consumer, c has to increase by a multiple of 2 at every point in time while f has to increase by one at the same point in time to maintain the constant ratio of 2:1. Increasing only c by 2 or only f by 1 will maintain the constant ratio and it will lead to a waste of the increased unit of the affected commodity.
Therefore, option (B) U(c,f)=min{2c,f} is the correct answer that gives a constant ratio of 2:1 = 2c:f.
I wish you the best.
Answer: The correct answer is "a. decrease; decrease; decrease".
Explanation: Suppose the Federal Reserve engages in open-market operations. It sells $20 billion in U.S. securities. It also raises the reserve ratio. This causes excess reserves to <u>decrease</u>, the money supply to <u>decrease</u>, and the money multiplier to <u>decrease</u>.
