1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Daniel [21]
4 years ago
8

Why was trade vital to the time period Pax Romana?

History
2 answers:
Simora [160]4 years ago
7 0
The Pax Romana<span> (</span>pax<span> is Latin for peace) was a prolonged </span>period<span> of peace in the Roman Empire that lasted for more than two centuries, from about 27 B.C. until around A.D. 180. During this time no other empire or military power achieved victory against the Romans.</span>
nevsk [136]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Pax Romana (pax is Latin for peace) was a prolonged period of peace in the Roman Empire that lasted for more than two centuries, from about 27 B.C. until around A.D. 180. During this time no other empire or military power achieved victory against the Romans.

You might be interested in
How did the mexican independence movement differ from those in south america?
mojhsa [17]

Answer:

I did I just hair had ugh she hush he jury hey his hand huh cynic then he huge but huge

Explanation:

juduueuydydyydydhzjxuxnisjyxjekh,hdjxuhejhuejhxuxuhshuzud

7 0
2 years ago
What was the nuclear family?
Mariana [72]
A household consisting of a mother and father and their children
7 0
4 years ago
Why does zinn claim that wilson made a flimsy arguement?
Svet_ta [14]
The reason why Zinn claims that Wilson made a flimsy argument is that, Wilson suggested a war with Germany since that they had threatened the US and has problems with US ships, <span>but the British did the same thing and Wilson did not want to start a war. Hope this answers your question.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Who was the intended audience that Dr. King hoped would read his "Letter from a Birmingham jail​
Nataly [62]

Answer:

It was intended for the Birmingham clergymen.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
4. Would you have supported the populist Party? Why or why not​
Luba_88 [7]

Explanation:

1 ) Why would you have supported the populist Party ?

2 ) Why have you not supported the populist party?

MARK AS BRAINLIST IF IT IS USEFUL

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • After the War of 1812, the first expansionist goal of the republic was the acquisition of A. the Oregon Country B. California C.
    9·2 answers
  • (US GOVERMENT GENERAL HISTORY)
    15·1 answer
  • Why do you think people like John Brown, who advanced more radical ideas, became popular during the 1850s?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was Rhode Island founded
    8·1 answer
  • how do the building of dams and pollution have impacted farming and water reserves in southwest asia?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the corrupt bargain of 1824
    5·1 answer
  • Stretching from Canada to Mexico, the
    6·1 answer
  • Do humans have a right to access to water...explain why or why not?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was the port of Adulis so important?
    8·1 answer
  • In Roman numerals, how many hours are in a day?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!