The first pair, fourth pair, and fifth pair can be used to contrast the careers of writers and editors.
(this goes for the picture u have put in. if you need me to choose from the text you listed i can also do that) Hope that helped, if you don't understand, you can comment below and i'll edit it.
Answer:
The answers are given below.
1.There are many limits on free speech= Weak.
2. The use of solar energy can affect foreign policy by decrease oil imports= Strong and unique
3.Too much dependency on technology is bad for people= weak
4.The federal government should spend at least 15 percent of its budget on developing renewable energy sources= Strong and unique.
Explanation: The sentences provided on the passage are divided into strong and weak category for thesis statement.
The sentence 1 and 3 are seemed as weak. Because these statement are very common as a statement. So it doesn't make any unique statement for the thesis. Moreover, these statements doesn't have any accurate information and logic which can make a biased view on the thesis. They are relative views which depend on the side effect.
On the other hand the sentence 2 and 4 is strong and more unique. These sentences are based on obvious issues which have accurate facts and information. As a result it is easy for the writer to present the topic strongly. Moreover these statements are about solar energy issue and renewable energy issue which unique to explain. Because now these issues are the trending matter in the world.
Move around i tweak the tweezers <span />
The celebration was not a VICTORY OF PARTY but a CELEBRATION OF FREEDOM.
Unlike in the American Revolution, every celebration was a victory party against their enemies. The Celebration of freedom is a party that everyone is enjoying because of their forebears fought for freedom against the oppressors.
Here is a part of the speech that will signifies the difference and call to action to the men of today:
"The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God.