1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ad libitum [116K]
3 years ago
10

Two people are having a discussion. What should they do to ensure that the discussion is positive and rewarding? A. They should

withhold their views to avoid being judged.
B. They should speak openly with few inhibitions.
C. They should steer the conversation in their favor.
D. They should speak more than they listen.
English
2 answers:
lapo4ka [179]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:B.) They should speak openly with few inhibitions.

Explanation:

postnew [5]3 years ago
5 0
If two people are having a discussion, the thing they should do to ensure that the discussion is positive and rewarding is that B. they should speak openly with few inhibitions.
They need to say whatever is on their mind, as long as it is not offensive. 
You might be interested in
I WILL UPVOTE!
irinina [24]
D. Hint at what will happen. 
8 0
3 years ago
Which thesis does Julio present effectively?
ddd [48]

Answer:

<u>The</u> thesis Julio presents effectively is (B) Many folk tales are not happy children's stories but dark, realistic tales.

<u>Explanation</u>:

Julio tells us tales that are often harmless and enjoyed by kids. The tales are filled with magic in which good wins and evil is always defeated at the end.

But the “original folk tales” represent the reality of life. They show about hunger, death and everyday struggles of people. They show real feelings of people. Julio says that all these original tales are always true and dark but some of them might be. Example of such story is when Cindrella’s step sisters cut their toe finger to fit in the shoe.

4 0
3 years ago
I the essay the narrator knows that he shouldn't kill the elephant, but does so anyway why does he do this? Describe a time when
mestny [16]

The poet described about the kill of the Element is given below.

Explanation:

In the 1920s a young would-be poet, an ex-Etonian named Eric Blair, arrived as a Burma Police recruit and was posted to several places, culminating in Moulmein. Here he was accused of killing a timber company elephant, the chief of police saying he was a disgrace to Eton. Blair resigned while back in England on leave, and published several books under his assumed name, George Orwell.

In 1936 these were followed by what he called a “sketch” describing how, and more importantly why, he had killed a runaway elephant during his time in Moulmein, today known as Mawlamyine. By this time Orwell was highly regarded, and many were reluctant to accept that he had indeed killed an elephant. Six years later, however, a cashiered Burma Police captain named Herbert Robinson published a memoir in which he reported young Eric Blair (whom he called “the poet”) as saying back in the 1920s that he wanted to kill an elephant.

All the same, doubt has persisted among Orwell’s biographers. Neither Bernard Crick nor DJ Taylor believe he killed an elephant, Crick suggesting that he was merely influenced by a fashionable genre that blurred the line between fiction and autobiography.

To me, Orwell’s description of the great creature’s heartbreakingly slow death suggests an acute awareness of wrongdoing, as do his repeated protests: “I had no intention of shooting the elephant… I did not in the least want to shoot him … I did not want to shoot the elephant.” Though Orwell shifts the blame on to the imperialist system, I think the poet did shoot the elephant. But read the sketch and decide for yourself.

5 0
4 years ago
A. conclusion <br> b. exposition <br> c. conflict<br> d. rising action
pychu [463]
The rising action is where stories develop
6 0
3 years ago
Brutus is often considered a tragic hero, or in other words a character who makes a judgment error that inevitably leads to his/
sveticcg [70]

Brutus is a tragic hero as his judgement of error in killing Caesar leads to his downfall but he is an inherently good man.

Explanation:

Brutus is an enigmatic character in the play as he joins the conspiracy and drags the dagger into the heart of Caesar yet he has love for him and torments himself for doing it.

He does not kill Caesar eventually because he hates him, he mentions repeatedly that he likes him and thinks of him as a great man and as a friend .

He does so because he thinks this is what will be good for Rome and as a patriot it is his responsibility to do this for the nation.

He torments himself for the act and realizes eventually that it has done more harm than good, making him die in the end as his fall is tragic and follows the classical principles.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 8) The author MOST LIKELY uses the third person point-of-view
    13·1 answer
  • What does dilate mean in Frankenstein
    9·2 answers
  • HELP *TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD CH. 1*
    12·1 answer
  • HELP!! ASAP!! : Observe the image, then make a description, give its opinion on the image. (7 lines minimum).
    10·2 answers
  • Which line from Across Five April's is the BEST example of the unigue dialect used in the passage
    6·1 answer
  • 3. When writing a research paper, it is
    14·2 answers
  • What is a long narrative poem involving a hero or heroes called? epic romance novel
    13·2 answers
  • 2. What were two negative things that grew out of American<br> expectations during the 1950s?
    11·1 answer
  • Mandela gives greater importance to its people we call them the pure diamond justify the statement​
    7·1 answer
  • From The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!