Goods sold is lower because less competition and then they price it higher because consumers don't have options.
Answer:
1 +1R4= {(1 +1R3)(1 + E(4r1) +L4)}1/4
1.0500 = {(1.0475)^3(1 + 0.0525 +L4)}1/4
(1.0500)^4= (1.0475)3^(1 + 0.0525 +L4)
(1.0500)^4/(1.0475)^3= 1 + 0.0525 + L4
(1.0500)4/(1.0475)^3-1.0525
L4= .0050358564 = 0.504%
Answer:
US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.
Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)
China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.
However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.
Explanation:
There are two alternatives
1. Sold for $6,300
The inventory parts should be sold for $6,300 as the current inventory parts are not relevant as it is a sunk cost i.e $18,500
2. Repair and after that sale it
Now in this case, we have to determine the benefit generated i.e come from
= Sale value - repairing cost
= $19,700 - $9,100
= $10,600
As we can see that the alternative 2 generated higher benefit as compare to the alternative 1 so it would be more beneficial for the company