The correct answer is A. Hannah Teter has won medals in several Olympic games: 2003 Aspen, 2006 Turin, and 2010 Vancouver
Explanation:
In grammar, the colon (:) is mostly used to introduce a list or set of elements that explain a previous sentence. This means the colon should be placed right before the elements it introduces and besides this, it can only be included if the previous sentence is independent. According to this, in the sentence "Hannah Teter has won medals in several Olympic games: 2003 Aspen, 2006 Turin, and 2010 Vancouver" the colon should be placed after the word "games" and before "2003 Aspen" because "2003 Aspen, 2006 Turin, and 2010 Vancouver" is the list of items that explain the Olympic games Hannah Teter participated in, also by placing the colon in this position the first sentence is complete and independent.
I believe the answer is heroic couplets, which is a traditional form for English poetry, commonly used in epic and narrative poetry, and consisting of a rhyming pair of lines in iambic pentameter.
The lesson of two wolves indicates that The characteristics that you reinforce will be the ones you will most likely display. Thus the correct answer is C.
<h3>What is the moral of the battle of two wolves?</h3>
The tale of the two wolves offers comfort and encouragement to those who fight to overcome their unhappy emotions and ideas and replace them with happy ones.
The grandfather's sage advice serves as a gentle reminder to everyone that people can change and that it can be realized by concentrating one's emotions in the appropriate way.
This story indicates that an individual is fighting with themselves internally which shows emotions and surroundings. It shows things you emphasize will be the ones you most likely reveal.
Therefore, option C reinforces will be the ones you will most likely display as the appropriate answer.
Learn more about the battle of two wolves, here:
brainly.com/question/27960862
#SPJ1
The protagonist would be Cinderella
Hm, are you sure you got the question right? Because all of the sentences are written in active voice! Active voice is essentially everything that is not in the passive voice, and I don't see any passive voice here.
Passive voice would be formed with subject+form of "to be" + past participle,
and we have no example of this. All of the sentences here are in active voice.
