Answer:
A. Conflict Theorist
Explanation:
Conflict theory is a term used in sociology and social psychology that describes the relationship in between differences in power structures such as class conflict; that is distribution of power, resources and inequality, and various existing but contrast dominant ideologies.
Thus, a conflict theorist perception of society is about a society full of inequality in power and class structures, that brings out social conflict and social change.
Hence, Bob is considered a Conflict theorist, because, he view the relationship between U.S employer and Asian migrant as relationship based mainly on conflict, rather than balance and harmony.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
After receiving several tickets for speeding, Joseph lost his driver’s license for several months. When he got his driver’s license back, Joseph stopped speeding. The reason he stopped speeding is due to the consequence known as:
a) negative reinforcement
b) positive punishment
c) negative punishment
d) response chaining
Answer:
The reason he stopped speeding is due to the consequence known as:
c) negative punishment.
Explanation:
Reinforcement and punishment are means used to teach a person or animal to behave or to not behave a certain way. While reinforcements seek to motivate a certain behavior, punishments seek to discourage an undesirable behavior.
<u>We can have positive and negative punishments. Positive punishments consist of adding something that is unpleasant - for instance, the speeding tickets. On the other hand, negative punishments consist of removing something pleasant, taking away something desirable. When Joseph lost his license for several months, he lost something he needed and enjoyed. He was no longer allowed to drive. That is a negative punishment. With this punishment, he finally learned to stop speeding. </u>
? First of all are you sexually active lol
Answer:
Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the Constitution
Explanation:
Supreme Court ruled based on the constitutional principal of Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the Constitution regarding the relationship between the state and federal governments.
Here, the court, ruled that, Maryland has no power to tax the Bank because, considering Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the Constitution, the laws of the United States is superior in the case of conflicting state laws. In the Chief Justice word: "the government of the Union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action, and its laws, when made in pursuance of the constitution, form the supreme law of the land." Because "the power to tax is the power to destroy,".
Other constitutional principle in which the verdict was based in relation to state and federal government is the issue of " constitutional sovereignty" in which United States has constitutional sovereignty there by Maryland's tax, violated constitutional sovereignty because it acted as a levy against all the people in the United States by a state accountable to only some of the people.
Another constitutional principle in which the court rule is Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, which expressly grants Congress the power to pass laws such as the power to regulate interstate commerce, collect taxes, and borrow money.
That's an opinion to be honest
