To be reticent is to not reveal one's thoughts readily. In this case, it is the reticence of the author. The author does not reveal their thoughts readily. If the narrator or author refuses to do something, it is made known that he is doing something. The something here is him refusing. If he acts as if the situation is normal, I'd assume he is acting in such a way that would be nonreactionary of the actions from the provoker. I would safely choose the last option as sorrentino's exercising of authorial reticence.
Used in competition , one is far better than another. <span />
Answer:
This is because scientists can only really guess how the earth started and got to this point. Even with evidence like fossils, etc. they still don't have clear answers for what really happened, and they still have no clue how the Earth was created in the first place, so that's why evolution is a theory. They know how gravity works so it is called a law. hope this helped! good luck! (:
Answer:
okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
