Answer:
87%
Explanation:
The computation of the likelihood for high demand is as follows:
Given that
The high consumer demand probability = P(H) = 0.6
The low consumer demand probablity = P(L) = 0.2
The Probability of favorable survey response given high consumer demand = P(F ÷ H) = 0.9
And,
Probability of favorable survey response given low consumer demand = P(F ÷ L) = 0.2
Now, determine the probability of high demand that the market report is favorable = P(H ÷ F)
P(H ÷ F) = (P(F ÷ H) × P(H)) ÷ (P(F ÷ H) × P(H)) + (P(F ÷ L) × P(L))
= ((0.9) × (0.6)) ÷ ((0.9 × 0.6) + (0.2 × 0.4))
= 0.87096
= 0.87096 × 100
= 87%
When companies join together to try to control prices or eliminate competition so that they exclusively benefit, it is called collusion.
Collusion occurs in oligopoly market, when oligopoly firms make joint decisions, and act as if they were a single firm to control prices or eliminate competition. Collusion requires an agreement between cooperating firms, the agreement can be either explicit or implicit, in order to restrict output and achieve the monopoly price.
So this causes the firms to be interdependent, as the profit levels of each firm depend on the firm’s own decisions and the decisions of all other firms in the industry.
Hence, an example of illegal collusion is a secret agreement between firms to fix prices.
To learn more about collusion here:
brainly.com/question/13974450
#SPJ4
<span>In
the cash flow statement whether the direct or indirect method is used, it
depends on the nature of business. If the company is into buying and selling
(trading) of land, the cash purchase of land can form part of the Operating
Activities. If it is otherwise, the cash purchase of land should be included in
the Investing Activities section. </span>
Answer: The statement is <u>TRUE.</u>
Explanation: The theory of purchasing-power parity is an economic theory that tries to calculate the exchange rate between the currencies of two countries necessary so that the same basket of goods and services can be purchased in the currency of each one, that is, so that the purchasing power (or purchasing power) ) of both currencies is equivalent.
<span>The issue here is whether Tracy had enough to drink that would cause him to be mentally incapacitated. If Tracy was mentally incapacitated, the contract would be rendered unenforceable and thus, Tracy would not need to honor the contract and vice versa. However, if Tracy cannot show this, the contract will likely be upheld.</span>
