Answer:
Centralized production processing facility considers top management as the apex of decision making.
In decentralized production processing the decision making is delegated to teams and multiple individuals.
Explanation:
Centralized facility:
Pros:
a. In centralized facility top management commitment helps in improved decision making
b. Allocation of budgets to improve production processes.
c. The process becomes a part of strategic planning.
d. Standardization of processes like Mcdonalds kitchen.
e. Lower costs
f. Better forecasting
Cons:
a. Lack of flexibility
b. In case of international chains customers may be dissatisfied with standardized procedures
c. No room for customization
Decentralized Facility:
Pros:
a. Flexibility
b. Customer oriented approach
c. lack of bureaucratic procedure
d. quick decision making
Cons:
a. No standardization
b. Every Team has its own benchmarking process to evaluate performance.
c. Costly
d. Planning, budgeting and forecasting is effected adversely.
I have the same question if anyone can help please let me know
Answer:
the marketing manager or director
Explanation:
The marketing manager or director (depends on the organizational layout) is the individual responsible for leading the marketing department or unit of the company. He or she is the one in charge of overseeing and controlling new and existing marketing strategies and campaigns.
P = $7,000, principal
r = 6% = 0.06, rate
n = 1, compounding interval
t = 4 years
Calculate the value after 4 years.
A = 7000*(1 + 0.06)⁴
= $8,837.34
Answer: d. $8,837.34
Answer:
That the mistake resulted from an accidental clerical error and that it would be unconscionable to enforce the contract.
Explanation:
Nicole mistake is a clerical error.
An error is said to be clerical if it's a mistake that changes the meaning of a document after.
Typographical error and unintentional addition or removal of a word, phrase, or figure in the document can count as clerical error.
Mistakes like this should be readily rectified without objection by the court acting sua sponte, on its own, or on the motion of either party.