Answer:
E. Shifting from a multi-country to a global strategy.
Explanation:
- The process of diversification allows the firms to reap the competitive advantages as the benefits of the skills and transfers, low costs economies of scope.
- Cross boundaries used by the powerful brands and collaboration in the creation of stronger and competitive capabilities.
- A diversified firms thus look for a global strategy to spread its risks and establish its business and develop its main strategic alternatives.
- The diversified firms hence have ample market opportunities and thereby brain the scope of the business.
Large companies have the ability to take advantage from the economies of scale through offering goods which are more affordable than other smaller retailers. This is because as the company grows, their unit cost decreases due to some factors caused by the economies of scale.
Answer:
We count on companies to provide us with safe products, and to provide us with full disclosure if they are using potentially harmful chemicals in the production and distribution of their products. Under <u>strict product liability</u>, if in a court of law it is proven that a well-known fast food chain is using a potentially harmful chemical in the preparation of their fries, the company is likely to be required to disclose information on this process to its customers.
Explanation:
Strict product liability is where even if a product was safely designed, was properly manufactured, and contained an appropriate warning, a manufacturer or retailer of a product may be liable for injuries resulting from use of the product simply because the product caused those injuries.
<span>Unreliable. Campaigners don't necessarily show their true colors during campaigns. They like to put on a show to get attention. They also make claims that seem like they care about the good of the nation, but that could actually hurt the economy or the country as a whole. But they could also be in favor of policies that are good for the country/economy, but could anger people because those policies appear to hurt a group/groups of people.</span>
Answer:
It is less expensive to keep your old car.
Explanation:
We have been given that you currently drive 250 miles per week in a car that gets 24 miles per gallon of gas.
1 year equals 52 weeks.
5 years equals 260 weeks.
The old car gives a mileage of 24 miles per gallon of gas.
Therefore, the total of using old car for 5 years is $18979.16.
We are told that new car gives a mileage of 53 miles per gallon.
Since the cost of using new car for 5 years is greater than cost of using old car for 5 years, therefore, it is less expensive to keep your old car.
