Answer:
To mitigate damages
Explanation:
When a a tenant breaches the terms of a real estate agreement, the landlord must come in to get another tenant to occupy the space.
He is avoiding a situation where the property is to be left unoccupied for a period of time.
Mitigating damages is a way of reducing further loss when one party breaches a contract.
In the given scenario if a tenant moves out of leased premises before the term of the lease expires, the landlord is required to make a reasonable attempt to lease the property to another party.
A the first groupings has 200 medium-side busi es-es each needing 128 addresses
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The formula for equivalent units units as follows:
Opening Work in Process + Equivalent units on which the work is done - Closing Work in process = Units Transferred
Therefore, ideally,
Opening work in process - Closing work in process = Units transferred - Equivalent units on which work is done.
As adding all the cost incurred during the period to opening inventory of work in process, we get the total cost for the period, thereafter, deducting the cost allocated to closing work in process we get the value of goods produced and transferred.
<u>Therefore, above statement is false.</u>
The amount of net investment income tax that the taxpayer is required to pay is $231.
<h3 />
<h3>What is
net investment income tax?</h3>
Net Investment Income Tax are generally imposed by the Internal Revenue on entities' net investment income.
Net investment income tax = ($6,150 - $75) * 3.8%
Net investment income tax = $6,050 * 3.8%
Net investment income tax = $231
In conclusion, the amount of net investment income tax that the taxpayer is required to pay is $231.
Read more about income tax
<em>brainly.com/question/25257355</em>
Answer: The answer is as follows:
Explanation:
From these numbers, we can conclude that USA has a comparative in producing cars and France has a comparative advantage in producing bottles.
Opportunity cost shows that how many units of one good have to be foregone in order to produce one additional unit of other good.
In USA:
Opportunity cost of producing bottles = 
= 0.75
Opportunity cost of producing cars = 
= 1.33
In France:
Opportunity cost of producing bottles = 
= 0.55
Opportunity cost of producing cars = 
= 1.8
Above calculations clearly shows that USA has a lower opportunity in producing 1 unit of car as compared to the France, so it has a comparative advantage in producing cars.
Whereas, France has a lower opportunity in producing 1 unit of bottle as compared to the USA, so it has a comparative advantage in producing Bottles.
