1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sophie [7]
3 years ago
7

As long as the jury is made up of persons representing a cross-section of the community in which the trial takes place, it is re

garded as comprising oneʹs peers. True or False?
Law
2 answers:
Vaselesa [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

good luck

Explanation:

the answer is true!!

oee [108]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: False

Explanation:

The jury is a body of people that have sworn of the law to render the impartial verdict related to any kind of case presented in the court of law. The jury must include people of cross-section of the community who are designated with some authority.

The jury listens the statements of the witnesses, suspect and victim to draw a conclusion about a case and decides whether the suspect is liable for compensation or hard punishment.

The jury must not include the known member of victim or suspect peer this may lead to partial decision and will create discrepancy.

You might be interested in
Which amendment prohibits excessive bail
aliya0001 [1]
The answer is 8th Amendment
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is the best example of populism?
o-na [289]
A government allows its people to govern themselves. <3
7 0
3 years ago
The use of the public wearing of letters was used to publicly shame criminals, including those who
balu736 [363]
A stands for adulterer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why it is sometimes nessessery to limit rights
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.

In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.

That's it you need to know!

Hope it helps you mate!

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these arguments might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws?.
julsineya [31]

The argument that might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws is that Corporations and labor unions that have too much power.

Financial law is defined as the law and standard or regulation of the derivatives, insurance, commercial banking, investment management sectors, and capital markets.

The people that support the strict campaign finance laws are the companies or corporations and the labor unions because they have a too much power in the finance laws.

learn more about the finance laws here

brainly.com/question/515053

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • • Do police officers always live up to this Code of Ethics?
    6·1 answer
  • (There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
    5·1 answer
  • Enforcement of the treaty of versailles began with the issue of
    7·1 answer
  • True or False? It is illegal to call a pickle, a pickle if it doesn't bounce in CT?
    8·2 answers
  • Estimate 49.87 divided by 10
    15·1 answer
  • Why might the government not want to give lawyers to every single person accused of any
    10·1 answer
  • Ideas, beliefs, or attitudes about what is important are _________.
    5·1 answer
  • What can the criminal justice system do to better prepare for future terrorist incidents?
    11·1 answer
  • Ways of protecting human rights and the rule of law
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the steps an officer should take when indicating if the violator’s driver’s license is valid.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!