3 years ago

Explain why it is sometimes nessessery to limit rights

1 answer:

5 0

Answer:

It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.

In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.

That's it you need to know!

Hope it helps you mate!

You might be interested in

In what situations would a case to be heard in federal court?

sasho [114]

Explanation:

bankruptcy cases would be heard in a federal court

3 0

3 years ago

Judicial Review, amendments, and the elastic clause are examples o

aivan3 [116]

Answer:

c. our governments ability to change over time

5 0

3 years ago

What is friction? and how it works ?

andrezito [222]

Answer:

is a action of two objects rubbing togetther on a surface

Explanation:

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

New York's Truth in Testing Law dictates that<br> tests publishers must

Leona [35]

Answer:

Follow a strict protocol?

Explanation:

7 0

4 years ago

Assume that the U.S. Congress has passed a federal statute that is in conflict with a Wisconsin state constitutional provision.

vredina [299]

Answer: It is not.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.

This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.

For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.

3 0

3 years ago