Explanation:
Although the material is banned, I will keep the person in abeyance unless there is any proof against his allegations. Even if nothing is confirmed, picking such a person who is a compulsive liar would be in my own choice. I can not endanger my company and its workers by recruiting an employee who may be off - the-record suspect, if the offense is not confirmed. I comprehend that it is not legitimate to act on the prohibited information, but an act of a non-social nature is equally a ban on society, and I, as a recruiter, can not promote the same thing.
Answer: Holmes wrote: The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.
Found: google
Answer:
A civil case is when a person or business claims to have been harmed by the actions of another person or business.
Explanation:
so it should be b
