Answer:
They Did :D
Explanation:
The English Bill of Rights created a constitutional monarchy in England, meaning the king or queen acts as head of state but his or her powers are limited by law. Under this system, the monarchy couldn't rule without the consent of Parliament, and the people were given individual rights.
A. Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler at Munich.
Chamberlain governed Britain before WWII, and World War One was still fresh in the minds of his citizens, who had lost fathers, sons, brothers and comrades, with many men coming back without limbs, or with PTSD or "shellshock". Chamberlain's main concern was to avoid another war at all costs, by allowing Hitler's Germany to break many rules of their constraints, enforced by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain resigned once he realized war was imminent, and Churchill took office, having believed that Appeasement was shameful and ineffective.
In the <em>Lochner v. New York</em> case of 1905, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not <u>impose limits on the number of hours that employees could work.</u>
Further details:
A law passed in 1895 in the state of New York mandated that bakery employees could not work more than 10 hours a day and not more than 60 hours in a week. A bakery owner named Joseph Lochner filed suit against the state, claiming the law was unconstitutional. At the time, the Supreme Court decision was based on the idea that such laws violated an employee's "freedom of contract." The majority of justices saw such a right implicit in the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, thinking that if employees agreed to work a heavy number of hours it was their right to do so.
In the time since the Lochner case, the Supreme Court has gone in the other direction, allowing laws that impose reasonable restrictions on businesses. An example would be <em>West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish </em>(1937), which upheld the constitutionality of a minimum wage law passed in Washington state.
