1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seraphim [82]
3 years ago
5

In the death penalty law of the Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, each capital crime, except conspiracy and rebellion, w

as accompanied by an appropriate biblical quotation as justification.A. TrueB. False
Law
1 answer:
Mademuasel [1]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is A: true

Explanation:

It is said that Puritan law was extremely strict; men and women who did not act in accordance with the Bible were severely punished for their actions. Puritans were very religious people. They believed they were on earth to do God's work. Those who did not do "God's work" received harsh punishment.

Every time Puritans administered punishment, they felt no remorse at all because according to their beliefs, they were complying with the Old Testament, and therefore, they followed the methods of punishment the Old Testament proposed.

You might be interested in
A 12kg ball would require what force to accelerate it down a field at a rate of 4m/s2 ​
Talja [164]

Answer:

<h2>48 N</h2>

Explanation:

The force acting on an object given it's mass and acceleration can be found by using the formula

force = mass × acceleration

From the question we have

force = 12 × 4

We have the final answer as

<h3>48 N</h3>

Hope this helps you

7 0
3 years ago
When accused of a Felony, the accused has the right to a Grand Jury hearing according to the
Marysya12 [62]
5th Amendment Right of Persons,

FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
7 0
3 years ago
Use this circular flow diagram illustrating the roles of businesses and individuals in both the Product and Resource (factor) ma
Elis [28]

Answer:

B) In the resource market, businesses sell productive resources to households, who act as consumers in this market; in the product market, businesses act as consumers, providing households with income for goods and services. In the resource market, households sell productive resources to businesses, who act as consumers in this market in the product market, households act as consumers, providing businesses with revenue for goods and services.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
3-38 Alimony. As a result of their divorce, Fred agreed to pay alimony to Tammy of $20,000 per year. The payments are to cease i
NISA [10]

Answer:

a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?

Explanation:

a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony.  For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.

b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred  can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.   If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy  must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.

c. It's $100.000,00

d.  Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.

8 0
3 years ago
What type of mens rea might apply in each situation?
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

- The mugging of the police officer: purposeful

- The theft/disappearance of the fingerprints: knowing or negligent

- The arson: purposeful or reckless

Explanation:

Mens rea means "a guilty mind" as is required to prove a crime, along with actus reus (the criminal act). A purposeful mens rea means a crime was intentionally commited. A negligent mens rea is the failure to do what a reasonable person would do. A knowing mens rea means the potential result of a criminal act (such as lending a gun to someone who intends to shoot another person). A reckless mens rea increases risk to others, like driving under the influence.

Together, actus reus and mens rea form the corpus delicti or, both the criminal act and guilty mind.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would a city want to annex a suburban neighborhood?
    12·2 answers
  • Why was the second amendment created
    7·2 answers
  • Truck Transport Company is subject to a decision by the National Labor Relations Board. Truck Transport appeals the decision, ar
    14·1 answer
  • The number of House of Representatives + Senators = which of the following?
    6·2 answers
  • What article pertains to the Judicial Branch? ______________________________
    14·2 answers
  • how a federal bill becomes a law. These cartoons are out of order. Number the cartoon panels from 1 to 12 in the correct order o
    7·1 answer
  • HAMSTER ON A PIANO DONT ANSWER THIS PLEASE
    10·2 answers
  • Is restorative justice more effective than adversarial justice?
    10·1 answer
  • Hello! If a synovial ganglion (cyst) bursts due to a sudden movement or blow, does it reappear?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Explain what a criminal case is. 2. Explain what a civil case is. 3. As the judge, what is your job in a civil case?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!