Answer:
C.
Explanation:
It demonstrated that even a president is subject to the law
Answer:
The argument for the company would be based on the fact that, she could have had a defective tooth which only broke while eating the Katydids candies.<em> Most times, the warranty offered in food is with regards to the food being expired, unwholesome for eating due to foreign materials inside etc.</em>
<em>Her filing for breach of warranty over her defective tooth is uncalled for.</em>
Explanation:
False because philology is about discussing different points of view and it’s impossible that they all agree
