The answer is the first number line.
30/150 = 1/5 = 20%
Answer:
Option C is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Because when Peter advertise a site which is the local vacation rental site on his website. For the promotion he get the help to maintain his advertisement campaign by the Google Ads then, he cross-referencing to acquire the communication with the help of backend CRM and he facing the problem of not matching of the data. The reason behind this is the tracking of the conversation is generating duplicate.
It's called an <span>RSS (Really Simple Syndication).
</span>A Web service that aggregates selected information from various Web resources, including newsgroups, blogs, forums, and other news and information services and delivers it to a user ' s desktop in a convenient, easy-to-use format.
I'm going to assume this is Java, because you said "method" meaning it will be some sort of object oriented language, and Java's really common. Here would be the full program, but you can just take the method out isolated if you need it.
package lastname;
public class LastName {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Example usage:
String name = LastName.lastName("Garrett Acord");
System.out.println(name);
// Output: Acord G.
}
public static String lastName(String fullName)
{
String[] splitName = fullName.split(" ");
return String.format("%s %s.", splitName[1], splitName[0].substring(0,1) );
}
}
Answer:
The main benefit of the ordered list is that you can apply Binary Search( O( n log n) ) to search the elements. Instead of an unordered list, you need to go through the entire list to do the search( O(n) ).
The main cost of the ordered list is that every time you insert into a sorted list, you need to do comparisons to find where to place the element( O( n log n) ). But, every time you insert into an unsorted, you don't need to find where to place the element in the list ( O(1) ). Another cost for an ordered list is where you need to delete an element, you have an extra cost rearranging the list to maintain the order.
