Answer:
<u>Setting</u>
Explanation:
The setting refers to the location, time, environment, whether fictional or non-fictional, where a story takes place; it is a literary device that tends to influence the character's behavior and helps us understand why they act or think in a certain way. The statement provided, then, describes the setting because it indicates the time: “in nineteenth-century” and the place: “America” where Frederick Douglass’s narrative is developed.
Answer:
hope this helps :-)
Explanation:
carer and parental status. disability (including physical, sensory and intellectual disability, work related injury, medical conditions, also mental, psychological and learning disabilities) employment activity gender identity, lawful sexual activity, and sexual orientation.
Answer:
1. Ecologists call this one-way flow of matter and energy from a producer to a primary, then to secondary, and perhaps to a tertiary consumer, a food chain. ... ~ Single food chains do not show all the feeding relationships in ecosystems. The food web shows all the organisms at each feeding level or trophic level.
2. Energy flows through an ecosystem in one direction: from producer to primary consumer to secondary consumer to higher consumers. A biomass pyramid provides a picture of the feeding and nergy relationships within a food web and the direction of the flow of energy.
Explanation:
<span>A major criticism directed against the articles of confederation was that power was allocated primarily to "the states" as opposed to the central government, which made the US very weak--both socially and economically. </span>
Answer:
Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.
Explanation:
- Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
- The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
- The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
- I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.
