All of the above. my reasoning is that newspaper was the way to go for getting information and there were books and different forms of governments
Answer: Not fully.
Explanation: Even in communist societies, where the concept is for everyone to have the same thing, there is tension between different groups for inherent traits. It depends on your definition of "differences". If there were a group of people who knew nothing of racism, sexism, or any other -ism, it still wouldn't be possible for a society to be entirely accepting of others' differences. For example, maybe someone doesn't like someone else because of the pitch of their voice or a certain personality trait. Those are differences that you may not accept. Other differences could be actions some view as unforgivable, such as theft. In conclusion, I don't believe it's possible to have a society that fully accepts one another's differences. It is possible to have one that gets along together well, or even claims to love each other in all ways, but there will always be conflict between person to person and person to self. It's just life.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
I’m not sacred. I really dont have feelings about it. And I’m not afraid of only for old people tho.
A few words with the prefix pater/part are:
patriarch - head of the household
paternal - relating to the father
paternity - test to determine child's father.
The two reason are development and if a event happens to the character, the character would change his attitude toward life, like someone dying would change the tone of the story.
