Answer:
A. Politician
B. TV reporter
C. Newspaper editor-in-chief
D. Photojournalist
Explanation:
<u>C. Newspaper editor-in-chief</u>
Forced Germanic and Persian tribes into Roman lands, undercut Rome's tax base, and demanded expensive tribute. Rome was then always in constant warfare, began losing arts, and science. Basically sent the Roman empire backwards.
Answer:
place theory is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
mixed economy is a system that combines both capitalism and socialism aspects of the country.
Explanation:
In a mixed economic system the private properties are protected and enough freedom is given to exercise the optimum usage of capital but at the same time it allows the government to interfere or meddle with the various economic activities in the country to maintain or establish different social goals. So in mixed economy private ownership is acknowledged and maintained and control most of the production means but it is often set under the regulations made by the government. Due to globalization most countries across the globe have mixed economies, for example- US and France.
Likely rule against Mark.
Mark and Charles had an oral agreement over a few years and nothing was put into writing. This would trigger the statute of frauds, wherein certain types of agreements are required to be memorialized in writing.
This means that there is a situation in which two people are having to be taken at their word. On top of that, the agreement was made while they were impaired.
If a court didn't rule against Mark at the outset, there would be an investigation into whether the agreement was enforceable, how impaired they were, whether anyone else heard them, and what the historic uses were but there isn't enough time for a prescriptive easement or adverse possession. But this is likely a summary judgment case based on statute of frauds.
