Answer: it would be C.
Explanation: The Data is informing you that the meat or beef requires about 2,600 gallons of water. Now.. not everybody knows that tharts why it data... because it is informing you. hope this helps
Answer:
I think so
Explanation:
It depends on the type of situation though Like for example, Some Antagonists can become Antiheroes, Which are Protagonists for their own gains, and then can become Antagonist all over again. Sometimes, the Antagonist has a change of heart because of something, and Becomes a Protagonist all on its own. Sometimes, Antagonist just stay Antagonists
Answer:
an indirect reference to a place, person or a event
Explanation:
<em> </em><em>allusion </em><em>is </em><em>an expression designed to call something to mind without mentioning it explicitly; an indirect or passing reference.</em>
#◌⑅⃝●♡⋆♡Nåmřāthā ♡⋆♡●⑅◌
Answer: C. Inexplicable events are sometimes interpreted as supernatural experiences in Cuban culture.
Explanation: In the given excerpts about Pilar from Dreaming in Cuban, we can see two situations where supernatural experiences are used to explain events, in the first excerpt, she stared at the people who called her "brujita" to make them go away, and in the second excerpt, a woman claimed that her hair was falling out for the stares the baby gave her. So the correct answer is option C.
The correct answer is He withholds the fact that the falling horseman is the father of the shooter.
Throughout the story, the author yields a slow-paced description of the scene settings as a means to visually guide the reader. Moreover, they throw in clues such as the watchman's hesitation to shoot the horseman, as if the glance of the latter over the direction of the watchman caused him to react in that manner. This act may initially confuse the reader, but it isn't until the story's end that the horseman's identity is revealed, and so the climax of the story is explained and the surprise factor kicks in the reader.
The rest of the options are not as impactful since:
The watchman's conversation with his father seems ordinary at first, given the father's reaction to his son's desire to join the regiment. The revelation of the horseman's identity explains many of the phrases of this conversation, such as the father addresing the son as a traitor, meaning that both of the would fight on separate sides of the war. This is more fulfilling to the reader, rather than surprising.
The horse didn't bolt off the cliff until the watchman fired, but if it did before the shot, it wouldn't have been impactful to the story at any rate - considering the main surprise at the end.
