Answer and Explanation:
I will go through each and every option explaining the reasons and what option would be the best:
The (a) part says 'difference in wages will eventually disappear since a haircut is a homogeneous good' - This is not true because even though it is an homogeneous product, some customers do have a strong preference for barbers who are not going bald. Therefore, they know their worth and they would want to capitalize on that and get paid just a bit more than bald barbers.
The (b) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will be able to charge a higher price for a haircut to those consumers who have a strong preference for barbers with hair'. - If the barbershop charges higher price for barbers that have hair then the customers will prefer bald barbers as the questions mentions that there is high competition and since it is an homogeneous, customers would be willing to save money and get their haircut from some other barber.
The (c) part says 'barbershops that hire bald barbers will always be much more profitable' - Not necessarily. The reason is that some customers have a strong preference for barbers who are not bald and therefore, that would help barbershops who have barbers with hair to be a bit more profitable as some additional customers would want their services.
The (d) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will always be much more profitable' - This is the best option and the reason for it is because some customers have a strong preference for barbers with hair and that would help the barbershop to earn more. They would have the customers who already indifferent to whoever cuts their hair and in addition to that, they would also have the customers who have their preference.
Hence the answer is D.
<span>the part of the development process where Dan Kim does his research on his ideas is called innovation which is where new ideas are transformed into new products</span>
We would need to see the graph, but the equilibrium point is where the wage paid is equal to the supply of workers. On a graph, this would be the point where the two lines intersect. That is the point where the supply of people willing to do the job at a certain rate, meets the company's demand for workers and the rate they are willing to pay.
Answer:
$493.8
Explanation:
Since the 2016 financial statements of Leggett & Platt, Inc. includes the following information in a footnote. (in millions) 2016 2015 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 7.2 $ 9.3 Total accounts and other receivables, net $486.6 $520.2
Therefore the company’s current gross accounts and other receivables at the end of 2016 is
Net Total accounts and other receivables, net $486.6
Allowance for doubtful accounts ..........................<u>...$ 7.2</u>
Gross accounts and other receivables................<u>$493.8</u>
<u>The gross accounts and other receivables will be the amounts before making any allowances for doubtful accounts</u>
The key movements via are to increase the economy consist of a decreased bargain fee, buying government securities, and a decreased reserve ratio.
<h3>When the Fed makes use of contractionary policy?</h3>
When GDP in a kingdom is growing too fast, inflicting inflation to grow past a suited charge of two%, central banks will put in force a contractionary economic coverage. The Federal Reserve, or any principal financial institution, has three primary pieces of equipment to reduce the money supply.
A direct advantage of contractionary economic coverage is that it strengthens government budgets. As an instance, whilst the Fed's bargain price increases, the government earns extra cash from the banks that borrow budget from the Fed's cut price window. The government can use this supply of sales to offset spending and decrease price range deficits.
Learn more about contractionary monetary policy here brainly.com/question/27500362
#SPJ10
