<span>its how the Hassock children handled the trial.
hope that helps!!!
</span>
Answer:
Because they’re liberals!!
Explanation:
-Are the words "Transition" and "Conclusion sentence" there because you used it as a guide, you are required to have them, or you need to put one in
-There was a little bit of a lot of word and sentence repeating, I feel like a different word choice could have been used, like synonyms. Like instead of knowledge being used 500 times, awareness or apprehension, understanding, or comprehension could have been used. Just look up synonyms of words you used a bunch of times or for bland (boring) words
- There is some punctuation that could be improved
- Flow is good, with a few choppy parts
- Other than those it is really good
-Let me know if you need anything else, I am more than happy to help
The evidence Levitt and Dubner present in response to the counterclaim is that 7-7 wresters' results drop (first option).
<h3>What is a counterclaim?</h3>
This is a statement that disproves the main claim or thesis. Moreover, this can be answered by providing evidence that disproves the counterclaim.
<h3>What evidence do Levitt and Dubner present?</h3>
The counterclaim is that a 7-7 is more likely to win, this can be disproved through the detail that these wrestlers' results drop because this shows they are not more likely to win than others.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing; here are the options:
In the next match, 7-7 wrestlers' results drop below their predicted percentage.
The 7-7 wrestlers do well against both 8-6 and 9-5 opponents.
Wrestling matches only last a few seconds and are won by a quick exertion of force.
Wrestlers from the same stable do not oppose one another.
Learn more about counterclaim in: brainly.com/question/1757292
#SPJ1
