The environment of the New England colonies did not affect the development of slavery in this region. It did not affect the development of slavery because New England soil was not good for farming. Most slaves were used for farming, but since nobody owned a farm in this region, there was little need for slaves, period. Most of the New England region was industries and since the slaves would have to be taught how to do the job, the factory owners pretty much saw no purpose in even using slaves. Don't get me wrong, there may have been some parts of this region that WAS used for farming, but if there were any, it wasn't an abundant amount of them.
I hope this helps you out! Let me know if you need help with anything else! :)
The events that contributed, or occurred during the Chinese Revolutions is known are as listed below,
- World War II;
- Increase in the popularity of communism;
- Soviet Union's allies with China;
- End of the imperial system;
- Loss of power from the hands of the Qing Dynasty;
- World War I;
- Xinhai Revolution;
- Formation of Chinese Republic;
- Nationalization of railway by the government;
- Japan's defeat over China in 1925.
<h3>What is the significance of the
Chinese Revolution?</h3>
A series of Chinese Revolutions took place during the first half of the twentieth century, which was ignited mostly by the events that also led to the First World War.
Hence, the events that contributed, or occurred during, the Chinese Revolutions are aforementioned.
Learn more about Chinese Revolutions here:
brainly.com/question/2358846
#SPJ1
Answer:
Scrooge is deeply affected by the memory, and he walks with the ... They see schoolboys, and the Ghost explains that the people they see are ... Scrooge now sees an older version of himself in the prime of life. ... life-changing thought can be called an epiphany, and Dickens
Explanation:
Answer:
They believed the national government would be too powerful and would in turn compromise individual liberties.
Answer:
Yeomen
Explanation:
it’s yeomen farmers in my opinion it’s better to have a smaller amount of wealthy farmers.
