"<span>A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power" is the best option, since they thought that this would be redundant in a Constitution already given to these ideals. </span>
Here is the match:
King Charles 1
<span>- wanted new taxes to crush rebellion in Scotland.
- </span><span> violated provisions of Petition of Right.
Parliament
- </span><span>. introduced Petition of Right.
- </span><span> refused to finance foreign wars.
The difference between King Charles I and the parliament led to the event that known as the English Civil Wars. The war ended up in Parliament's victory and King Charles was forced to re-sign the petition of right that he abolished.</span>
One where the king lives is he answer
This is a simple definition of his philosophy called Dualism.
