1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
givi [52]
3 years ago
12

The main difference between a civic duty and a civic responsibility is:

History
2 answers:
kap26 [50]3 years ago
3 0
I'm hung on B; Civic duties include paying taxes, obeying laws of the country and actions such as those. Paying taxes, for one, is mandatory and cannot be avoided, so it is expected to be a fullfillment. D is sort of an answer, too, but not serving as a member of the jury is not punishable. As my history teacher once said, "There is always a silver medal answer behind the golden medal."
lapo4ka [179]3 years ago
3 0

B; Civic duties include paying taxes, obeying laws of the country and actions such as those.

You might be interested in
A country in Africa is experiencing a long period of time with no rainfall. Which of the following events is most likely to occu
anyanavicka [17]
Famine
(extreme scarcity of food)
4 0
3 years ago
As the idea of Black Power began to take hold, the SNCC
Leya [2.2K]
As the idea of Black Power began to take hold, the SNCC began to take on more significance as well, since it was pushing for the advancement of education for people of color. 
7 0
3 years ago
What are four reasons that Lodge gives for opposing the Treaty<br> of Versailles
STatiana [176]

Answer:

The Treaty of Versailles was the formal peace treaty that ended World War I between the Allies and Germany, their main enemy during the war. Senate Majority Leader Henry Cabot Lodge, a Republican from Massachusetts, opposed the treaty, specifically the section regarding the League of Nations.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Several years of drought in western Asia have led to widespread famine. The UN arranges to bring convoys of food to starving peo
Damm [24]

Answer:

The Great Compromise solved issues between states with small populations and states with large populations.

The Great Compromise was developed at the Constitutional Convention and helped in creating the modern day structure of Congress. In this deal, both states with small populations and large populations got something they wanted. For example, the Senate would be composed of 2 Senators from each state, regardless of their states population. This helped to ensure that smaller states had a voice in the creation of federal laws.

On the other hand, the House of Representatives would have the number of representatives based on a states population. The greater the population, the more representatives. This made larger states happy, as they felt this accurately represented the power they should have in Congr

4 0
3 years ago
What was the historical perspective from/of the British politician?
Ksenya-84 [330]
The origins of the United Kingdom can be traced to the time of the Anglo-Saxon king Athelstan,

What was the historical perspective from/of the British politician?

Such an emphasis on British exceptionalism hardly bodes well for a renegotiation that is open to the unity and shared interests which have been both the foundation and the strength of the European project thus far. Nor does it adequately articulate Britain’s relationship with Europe and the rest of the world. To suggest that a struggle for ‘democracy and fairness’ is ‘peculiar’ to Britain is historically problematic at best, demonstrably patronising at worst. Surely many participants in the French Revolution, one of the historical events which Abulafia argues sets Britain apart from continental Europe, were motivated, at least in part, by a desire for greater ‘fairness’? Incorporation of European laws into our domestic body politic has produced concepts of ‘fairness’ which supplement our common law; for example, our government must take into account the impact of welfare reform upon our children. An offshoot of the European Convention on Human Rights, our much maligned Human Rights Act was informed by both our struggles and those of our European neighbours to establish an institutional mechanism whereby our right not to be tortured could be enforced as a right, rather than a haphazard and piecemeal accumulation of variable and distinct codes in criminal and common law.
7 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • what was one impact of the printing revolution on european society? GACA the renaissance in nothern europe
    12·1 answer
  • How did Henry Knox see the new federal constitution as working “inversely to the public good”?
    11·1 answer
  • What Is meant by the term alliance
    13·1 answer
  • During the industrial revolution what tool does mankind develop?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were certain foods rationed during world war ii?
    8·2 answers
  • Three of the following are basic ideas of Marxism. Which is NOT?
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT PLZZZ how did the entry of the united states affect world war 1
    5·1 answer
  • In which of the following situations do the federal courts NOT have jurisdiction?
    15·1 answer
  • These are questions about The U.S enters world war 1
    12·1 answer
  • In what ways did flappers rebel against the earlier styles and attitudes of the victorian age?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!