Regretful, because the narrator says “sorry i could not travel both” and shows that they are regretful they can not do both
Yes i have read it but why you want to know
Answer:
Language is always changing. We've seen that language changes across space and across social group. Language also varies across time.
Explanation:
You can shape community behavior with positive language. ... The words that we use to refer to people change how we treat those people.
Answer:
d. To study logic it is important to learn to employ language precisely
Explanation:
Our ability to communicate and be able to express what we have in mind through words is something that has characterized us as living beings.
Being able to schematize our ideas from a linguistic basis is one of the foundations of logic. The language we use carries with it the meaning of our reality, without this part there would be nothing for us.
On the practical level, if a person must speak or think in a language other than the native one, logic and mental flow simply feel natural for that particular language.
Each language has a particular way of categorizing mental concepts. There are data that correlate the learning of multiple languages with the stretching of the plasticity of our brain.
Our conceptual understanding is, at best, tenuous with respect to the logic of language. The circumstantial evidence points to a schematism in human language that is highly restricted, but also very rich and easy.
I will help you! So, What makes a hoax successful? Well, this is the answer: <span>The recipe to a successful hoax requires several important elements, as exemplified by Barnum’s short story, </span><span>The Life of Joice Heth, the Nurse of George Washington. </span><span>Although the line between a believable hoax and an unreasonable tale can be ambiguous, Barnum toes this line and masters the art of deception by crafting his story to fascinate his readers while keeping it relatively realistic. His success can be attributed to the ignorance of his audience, among other convenient coincidences and artful techniques. Around 1835, when this story was published, many people weren’t as informed about medical and health concerns as they are today. Thus, the idea of a living 161-year-old woman might have seemed probable and even miraculous to many. Additionally, Barnum used reputable sources like the </span><span>New York Evening Star </span>and<span> Providence Daily Journal </span><span>to support his arguments, which only boosted his credibility. Mainly, Barnum used details regarding Joice Heth’s life and a real certification that she was George Washington’s slave to convince his audience that she really existed. Furthermore, he offered to let others see her in a circus, which appealed those who did and did not believe in the tale because the believers wanted to see the real deal and the non-believers wanted to see proof that it was all a hoax. In the end, Barnum effectively creates a successful hoax by teetering along the line between a conceivable story and ridiculous myth to craft a convincing argument that appealed to the general public. However, falling too far over this line with a tale too ridiculous could discredit the author and fatally reduce his/her reputation.
Hope I helped! :) Can you mark me as brainliest please.
</span>
