1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Colt1911 [192]
3 years ago
9

Do the events surrounding the Election of 2000 justify changes to the Electoral College? Explain why it does or why it does not

in a well-written paragraph with at least three reasons.
please help I need the answer fast
History
2 answers:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
8 0

No Gore did not win a mandate in 2000. He had only 48% of the popular vote which is not considered as a victory. He also lost many critical states which meant that he was not qualified to be president. Clinton failed to have a majority vote in 1992. However, he did win a plurality of the states and was suited to be president per the Electoral College.

Hope this helps you :P

Anastasy [175]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The events surrounding the Election of 2000 justify changes to the Electoral College because Bush had won more votes in larger states which shows how successful he was, Gore only got some votes from smaller states. The Electoral College not changing determines the president and other campaign runners to pay close attention to larger areas for votes. Receiving votes from larger states will diminish the votes from smaller states, therefore why the Electoral College can not change. Many people will disagree with these statements as they think, its unfair votes from larger states cancel out votes from smaller states, however it is correct and should not be disagreed upon. The Election of 2000 use a method called, "butterfly ballots" for voting, although this method was stressful, it worked very well.

You might be interested in
America is awesome today how was it awesome yesterday
goblinko [34]
Is this a question or not?
8 0
2 years ago
How did Northerners react to the Fugitive Slave Law?
Daniel [21]
During the Civil War the northerners fought because they were against slavery, the southerners fought because the slaves did the work for them.
7 0
3 years ago
Why midlevel food was important
almond37 [142]

Answer:

during war there wasn't much to eat hope this helps =D

8 0
3 years ago
Нєℓρ мє ρℓєαѕє ι'м ∂уιиg
Mama L [17]

the answer is the first name sequoyah

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP!!! 15 POINTS!! WILL GIVE BRAINLY!! HISTORY HW
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

The Ohio River Valley

Explanation:

Because it is the answer.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The student nonviolent coordinating committee (sncc) played a major role in sit-ins, ______________, and the march on washington
    15·2 answers
  • What forms of transportation do people rely on for public transport in Honduras?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes Georgia’s first government as a royal colony?
    13·2 answers
  • Who did karl marx believe would be the beneficiaries of socialism?
    14·1 answer
  • When the president appoints Cabinet members, what informal Constitutional change practice is he exercising?
    10·1 answer
  • Why does Adam Smith think that the government should stay out of economic affairs?
    15·1 answer
  • What was Thomas Jefferson's role in writing the Declaration of Independence?
    11·1 answer
  • 4. Mayans were first of the Mesoamerican people to develop a calendar and written language.
    8·1 answer
  • What is artifact used for?
    7·2 answers
  • he Spanish-American War was fought over the independence of which country? A. Spain B. Mexico C. Cuba D. the United States
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!