Answer:
$634,443
Explanation:
The computation of total overhead applied to Product P4 under activity-based costing is shown below:-
Activity Expected Expected Activity
costs Activity Rate
a b c = a ÷ b
Labor related $145,000 6,000 DLHs 24.17 per DLHs
Production
orders $68,360 1,400 orders 48.83 Per orders
Order size $1,069,190 5,800 MHs 184.34 per MHs
Product P4
Activity driver Overhead
Incurred Assigned
d e = c × d
2,000 $48,340
300 $14,649
3,100 $571,454
Total overhead cost $634,443
Answer: The optimal price is higher than market price by less than $0.50.
Explanation:
Since, it was given that Coase theorem doesn't hold in this situation, hence, the social marginal cost is greater than the private marginal cost by $0.50. The social marginal cost curve lies towards the left of demand curve.
Since the demand and supply curve are not perfectly elastic or inelastic, so the optimal equilibrium occurs at a point (price) which is greater than the prevailing market price, but the difference in the price is less than $0.50.
Therefore, the optimal price is higher than market price by less than $0.50.
Answer:
A web streaming company fulfills a 12-month service term paid by customers in advance.
Explanation:
Revenue is recognized from services rendered or goods delivered. It is recognized only when the risk and reward is transferred, further it relates to the normal business of company.
As in the first sentence the company makes scientific devices and it sales an agricultural land, that is sale of fixed asset.
In second case the pharmaceutical company receives donation which is anonymous.
All the things are not revenue for company.
It is only the web streaming company which shall recognize revenue as the services are rendered and revenue shall be recognized related to normal business of company.
Answer:
790,000, i.e. $79 x 10,000= 790,000
. Yes, the manufacturer should change the design. 666,667 (when it goes from 1/10,000 to 1/15,000). It is 500,000 (when it goes from 1/10,000 but 1/20,000)
. No, the benevolent social planner would not agree with the manufacturer's decision.
Explanation:
In the estimates provided by the manufacturer, the total cost of the design is equivalent to $79 x 10,000= 790,000. There should be an alteration in the design to remove the necessary precautions. If the probability is different from the estimate provided by the manufacturer, the planner will disagree with the decision made by the manufacturer. For example, a change to 1/15000 will make the total cost to be approximately $666,667.
