Answer:
The correct word to fill in the blank is TRANSNATIONAL.
Explanation:
Any activity that is carried out across national borders is said to be transnational in nature. Transnational organized crimes are criminal activities planned and executed across national borders.
Some examples of these criminal activities include; arms trafficking, human trafficking, drug peddling, terrorism offences and so on.
Answer:
160th Special Ops Aviation Regiment
.
Explanation:
160th Special Ops Aviation Regiment or 160 SOAR is the U. S. paratroops of that delivers helicopter assisstance during a special operation. These troopers are also known as Night Stalkers or Task Force Brown as they operate their missions during the nighttime.
<u>This guerilla troops are special trained forces that can work in any weather, any-time (day or night). Their operations are matchless and precise. This special force can work in any part of the world as well, not just limiting to the boundaries of the US.</u>
Thus the correct answer is the '160th Special Ops Aviation Regiment
.'
Answer:
i don't know the answer but you find the answer from brainly app
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, commonly referred to as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, makes the claim that how one thinks about reality depends on the language one speaks.
<h3>What is the explanation for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?</h3>
According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, a person's language's grammatical and more verbal structure affects how they see the outside world. It stresses how language shapes or has an impact on one's thoughts. For instance, in other languages, various words have distinct meanings.
According to the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, one's thoughts are either determined by or influenced by language. In other words, depending on the language used to describe the world, people who speak various languages have different perspectives on it.
For more information about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/5695330
#SPJ1
First statement is correct. Marbury v. Madison raises the need for a jury to review a law elevated by Congress when it contravenes the constitution in some aspect.
The second statement is not correct. McCulloch v. Mariland is important because it determines that the federal government has implicit powers over the states.
The third statement is incorrect because Marbury v. Madison does not grant executive power to evaluate whether a court decision is unconstitutional; on the contrary, it is the supreme court that has the final say in case a congressional law overrides the constitution.
The fourtj statement is incorrect. McCulloch v. Maryland is a case of tax competition. It does not grant any power to the executive and does not have to do with penalties imposed by the court.
