Distribute -x(-10x+9)
1 answer:
You might be interested in
<u>Question Completion</u>
(a)What is your null hypothesis?
(b)What is your expected phenotypic ratio based on Mendelian inheritance?
(c)Calculate the expected number of flowers you should have gotten based on the Mendelian inheritance. Then calculate a chi-square value, degrees of freedom, and a p-value.
- Chi-square statistic: _____
- Degrees of freedom (# phenotypes -1):
- P-value:
(d)Interpret your results. Do you reject it or fail to reject your null hypothesis (please restate the null)?
Answer:
(a)
(b)9:3:3:1
(c)
- Chi-square statistic: 3.8914
- Degrees of freedom (# phenotypes -1) =3
- P-value: 0.2734
(d)We fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the flowering plant, white flowers (B) are dominant over red flowers (b), and short plants (E) are dominant over tall flowers (e). An F2 generation was created by crossing two F1 individuals (each BbEe).
(a)The null hypothesis is:
(b)The gametes are BE, Be, bE and be.
The offsprings are presented in the table below:
The expected phenotypic ratio based on Mendelian inheritance
BE:Be:bE:be=9:3:3:1
(c)
Therefore:
- Chi-square statistic: 3.8914
- Degrees of freedom (# phenotypes -1): 4-1 =3
- P-value: 0.2734
(d) Our null hypothesis is:
Since p>0.05, the given data fit the predicted phenotypic ratio.
We, therefore, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
The difference in the observed and expected are sosmall that they can be attributed to random chance.
<u>Corrected Question</u>
The solution to an inequality is represented by the number line. How can this same solution be written using set-builder notation? {x | x > }
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given an inequality whose solution is represented by the number line attached below.
We observe the following from the number line
There is an open circle at 3, therefore the solution set does not include 3. (We make use of > or < in cases like that)
The arrow is pointed towards the right. All points to the right of 3 are greater than 3, therefore:
The solution in the number line can be written using set-builder notation as:
