Answer:
It is effective.
Explanation:
The claim is ineffective because it does not state a clear position.
It does state a clear position, (students should wear uniforms)
The claim is ineffective because it expresses a first person preference.
No mention of a first person preference in this statement.
The claim is ineffective because it suggests the essay will inform rather than argue.
It's rather clear the the person will argue for their claim, rather than inform the reader.
So by default, the answer must be that it is effective.
I think it would be "To identify what the author wants readers to do with the information in the article."
Answer:
I maintain my realationships with those I live with by just talking and doing things with them.
Explanation:
1 . One thing that goes well is Sustaining the relationship
2. One thing that goes wrong is everyone being agitated at being together for so long.
In the poem "<em>The Second Coming</em>" written by William Yeats, the author explores Anarchy and chaotic scenarios where things fall apart and order can only be reestablished by the return of <em>Jesus Christ</em> on earth.
When the author uses the phrase "<em>The ceremony of innocence is drowned</em>" he refers to a set of circumstances of violence, brutality and horror caused by what he calls "<em>a loose blood dimmed tide</em>" which suffocates purity and freshness, describing a cataclysm; worthy of resemblance to biblical passages of events involving destruction on a catastrophic scale such as Noah’s flood, or the total and final destruction of the world, described in the book of Revelation as "<em>The Apocalypse</em>".
The poem seems to be the author's emotional release after the presumable trauma of <em>World War I</em> around that time in Europe, since it was written in 1919.
It's an evident appeal to a Christian concept in seek of spiritual refreshment as a cathartic method to purge his likely repressed emotions in the post-war environment.
In "the open window" by Saki. The character Framton decides to go to the Stappletons' house to relax because he has been extremely nervous and believes the countryside will help him relax. Framton waits for Mrs.. Sappleton but Vera comes first and they start a conversation in which he discovers about the tragedy. This works as a contradiction to his expected outcome and actually makes him even more nervous.
The whole incident goes against what Framton expected, therefore is considered a situational irony.
The phrase in which that contradiction seems reflected from Framton Nuttel's perspective is: "She rattled on cheerfully about the shooting and the scarcity of birds, and the prospects for duck in the winter. To Framton it was all purely horrible."
