Answer:
The Atlantic charter was an agreement between United States and Great Britain
Explanation:
The Atlantic Charter was a joint declaration released by US president Franklin D. Roosevelt and British prime minister Winston Churchill following a meeting of the two heads of state in new foundland and it provided a broad statement of Us and British war aims. The meeting happened between Churchill and Roosevelt. They met aboard the Augusta in Placentia bay, Newfoundland to discuss their respective war aims for the second world war and to outline a postwar international system
#1) In this quotation, Du Bois disagrees with Booker T. Washington’s accommodationist approach because Du Bois is expressing that
Answer: Du Bois did not think blacks should submit to discrimination while patiently working for equality but should firmly oppose it. He argued that social change could be accomplished by developing the small group of college-educated blacks he called "the Talented Tenth". Booker T. Washington urged blacks to accept discrimination for the time being and concentrate on elevating themselves through hard work and material prosperity. He believed in education in the crafts, industrial and farming skills and the cultivation of the virtues of patience, enterprise and thrift.
Answer:
There are two opposing views on the Manhattan project. One, see it as one of United States greatest achievements from Second World War while others view it as a crime against humanity. Let's discuss this in detail.
Explanation:
Many hold the point of view that the Manhattan project resulted in the development of the deadliest weapon in history. It resulted in the deaths of more than a 100,000 people in Japan and continues to be a problem in the world today.
The other point of view is that the Manhattan project was necessary and if American had not developed it, the Germans would have, which would have made it a much more dangerous place. Supporters also point out to how it helped in the development of clean nuclear energy and nuclear medical science which benefits everyone today.
Personally, I agree that it was, at least, a necessary evil, which has protected the country and gave us tons of other benefits.
Answer:
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is a concurrent power, both state and federal gov can do it
Explanation: