Answer:
In the speech, Brutus tries to convince the audience that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome and its citizens.
Explanation:
Brutus appeals to the feelings of the crowd and even questions them because of their pride in being Roman.
What he seeks is to persuade the crowd, and this way not to be judged for having risen up against Caesar and to have betrayed him for being so close to him. That is why he tells his listeners that his reasons were honorable and that he did it exclusively for all of them.
He tries to show that what he did was for the good of the people and that anyone who wants to judge him would be admitting in some way that they feel like a slave.
Here we can see Brutus using Pathos, by going to the emotions of his audience to achieve his goal.
Answer:
<em>The subject was dropped, but it was clear that it would be brought up again.
</em>
Explanation:
The options you were given are the following:
- The subject was dropped, but it was clear that it would be brought up again.
- Even though the subject was dropped for a few days, it was evident that their curiosity and interest were not entirely stopped.
- The subject was dropped for many, many days. Clearly their interest and curiosity were bound to angrily rise again.
- They dropped the subject for a while, but everyone knew that it would inevitably come up again.
The most precise and concise way to rewrite the given sentence is the first one: <em>The subject was dropped, but it was clear that it would be brought up again.
</em>
A concise sentence is a sentence written in a direct, clear manner, using the fewest words possible. The longer the sentence is, the harder it is to understand it. This is why we should try to keep our sentences as short and direct as possible.
Answer:
A,C,D
because i had this exact question not to long ago and i memorized it
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Michael Pollan conducted extensive research in The Omnivore's Dilemma. What research question was he trying to answer throughout his journey, was if the American people have been conscious about the food they eat and the way they eat with so many options to choose from.
Here, we are referring to American author Michael Pollan, who wrote the book " Omnivore's Dilemma" in 2006.
In his book, Pollan refers to modern technologies and transportation advances, people had fewer options for food that were based on culture, tradition, and the food that was produced locally. However, as time went by and modernity advanced, there are too many options to choose from and people pay less attention to the quality of food they are having. He also critiques the quality of nutrition of the American people.
