<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
In mid-1999, the Walt Disney Company and the Hong Kong Government were associated with extraordinary exchanges about the likelihood of building the Hong Kong Disneyland amusement park on Lantau Island.
This case displayed point by point data about the proposed amusement park and the related basic leadership process with a specific accentuation on feasible improvement. It likewise spreads out the qualities of the Hong Kong Government and Hong Kong individuals that may have assumed a job in choice making.The case incorporates An and B parts concerning corporate and government basic leadership.
It right off the bat outlines the arrangement procedure among Disney and the Hong Kong Government, and considered the natural effect on Hong Kong. The troubles looked by governments in settling on choices about this exceptionally unmistakable vast scale venture are depicted.
It at that point clarifies the method of reasoning of the administration choice, which represents how legislative structure and culture influence the basic leadership process. At last, it demonstrated upgrades in Hong Kong Disneyland regarding practical administration and advancement.
Answer:
I might not be correct but I think this is an opinion question. What is the first thing you notice when looking back on that work?
