<u>Answer:
</u>
Edwin Sutherland would consider 'group association' as the underlying cause of deviance.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In the discipline of criminology, the concept of 'group association' is deemed to be utterly important. It is so because 'group association' has been observed to be a major cause behind most criminal activities that take place.
- The influence that is evident on members of certain groups due to the ideology they bear is often the reason behind individuals who come in contact with such groups becoming criminals.
Answer:
B. The higher up a mountain you go, the colder it tends to get (and in my experience, the drier too, but I don't want to assume that's always the case), therefore the number of plants that can survive tends to decrease.
Answer:
There was lots of new crops such as corn, which was good, but a negative is the enslavement of African people who were taken from their home.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! good luck!
The Five Pillars of Islam, Faith (Shahada),Prayer (Shalah), Charity (Sakat), Fasting (Shawm) and Pilgrimage (Hajj) provide a Muslim practitioner or believer with clear guidelines for leading a life in harmony with good and God and a well-defined way to experience one's religious experience.
The consequence of abiding by the Five Pillars of Islam is perfecting one's soul by steering away from sins and other spiritually unpleasant things. Today, Muslims in the U.S. interpret the term <em>jihad</em> (grossly translated as <em>holy war</em>) as a personal struggle in order to fight off personal defects and vices so that they can become better citizens, parents, persons, etc.
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
